Mining and Corporate Social Responsibility

Allan Payne, CEO of Scotbar Proprietary Limited of Queensland, Australia, was becoming increasingly disillusioned by global mining practices. In the 10 years since acquiring the Waterfall Quarry Helidon, 60 miles west of Brisbane, his company had come close to revolutionizing sandstone mining. However, he also knew that it would be more difficult in the short term to earn a financial return through sustainable mining. “We could just go after one product and it would be happy days,” he exclaimed.

Despite the challenges, Scotbar sought to achieve near 100 percent resource utilization, a goal that would prove to be far more expensive and time consuming than traditional mining. Although the company planned to combine efficiencies, innovation, and investment to ultimately reach its objective, it did nothing to protect its innovations from competitors. In Payne’s mind that was a good thing. In fact, he hoped that competitors would copy Scotbar’s products and methods. In a world of rapid resource depletion, global demand would far outpace production for the foreseeable future. More importantly, profit and loss were only part of the equation. Payne wanted mining companies to reduce their environmental impact globally and therefore welcomed the idea of other mining companies replicating Scotbar’s methods. Whether they would actually do so was another question. Without strict regulations, Payne was skeptical that mining companies would embrace costly new methods, even when they had the long-term potential to return a profit.

For me personally, for my kids and my grandkids, what we do now with the planet matters. Unfortunately, unless there is a trend, you’re left dragging people kicking and screaming to achieve something that should be a common practice.


Alan Payne and Terry Smith, founded Scotbar with a mission to redefine the way mining is practiced. Most sandstone quarries specialized in singular product supply. Some focused on exporting high quality stone, while others concentrated on boulders for landscaping. When Payne toured sandstone quarries, he was struck by the amount of waste he saw. Most mines were utilizing 20 percent or less of the extracted sandstone.

The only thing consistent about sandstone is the fact that it is inconsistent. Fractures, faults, and soft material lead to mountains of material not suitable for export or material not even suitable in the local domestic market. In an effort to make a quick dollar, owners would identify a good seam, then pillage until it ran out, often creating as much as 90 percent waste material. This then became an ongoing costly issue as they continued to try and seek out the high value material having to shift, re-shift, and shift again. (See exhibit 1)

In fact, it was the norm in all forms of mining that only a small portion of extracted minerals was suitable for production and sale.

We provided some services to a large local coal mine, and we realized that they were mining products that had good commercial value. For example, it is not uncommon for coal seams to be embedded into basalt and other hard rock materials that, if processed, could be used in other industries. What they would do is move the earth and other minerals, take their coal out and then go back and bury the non-targeted material. Then there’s another company down the road that gets a permit to open a totally new operation targeting the very material that the first company had just re-buried.

“What if that waste could be turned instead into useful products or utilized in some way?” he thought to himself.

I thought it would be pretty simple. There would be around five products that would pretty much utilize everything. So, the goal was to get close to 100 percent recovery as possible. How little did I realize just how difficult that would turn out to be.

The quarry Scotbar acquired in 2007 was one of 4,200 quarries in Queensland, 200 of which specialized in sandstone. It also epitomized everything that was wrong with mining. Previously known as the “Waterfall Mine,” the waterfalls were long gone, as were many of the indigenous plants and animals. In fact, the mine was in such a state of disrepair that it fell to fifth tier status, the lowest level possible. Well-run mines were classified as tier one or two. At tier three, the mine owners had to appear before the district manager to explain why the mine was not meeting standards. “Fourth tier you’re in front of the Commissioner of Mines and the Inspector of Mines,” one regulator explained. “If you’re a five tier you’re in loads of trouble. You’re sitting in court.”

When Payne acquired the mine, it was under state receivership. He immediately set out to restore the mine’s tier one status by adhering to strict regulatory standards, restoring native plant and animal species, and eliminating nearly all waste. The company spent considerable effort reclaiming not only the sites it used, but also those of previous owners. In one part of the quarry, the company spent $2 million reclaiming abandoned mines, filling holes, removing debris, and replanting native trees and shrubs.[1] Another project involved building a water bypass to prevent rainwater from entering the mine, which could result in contaminated runoff.

Payne attributed much of his concern for efficient and environmentally responsible resource utilization to his upbringing on a family farm. “Good farmers leave trees standing for the cattle,” he recalled. “Other guys would flatten everything. Dad used to take old machinery and build new stuff, so as not to be wasteful.” However, after hiring people capable of assessing the quarry’s capacity and potential output, Payne discovered the hard reality that had prevented other companies from achieving high resource utilization. In fact, nowhere in the world was resource utilization anywhere near 100 percent. “We started out with all the best intentions, but we were inexperienced,” he admitted. “The more we learned about the resource, the more we realized that we knew very little about it.” The unanticipated challenges of managing multiple products meant that the company’s extraction and production costs would be much higher than initially projected.

Disaster Strikes

Just as the company was beginning to get its footing, disaster struck. In 2011, a flash flood devastated the area, including nearby Toowoomba, Australia’s second largest inland city with a population of approximately 115,000. Payne directed his employees to use company equipment to help rescue nearly 80 flood victims, for which he was later hailed as a local hero.[2] In the aftermath of the flood, the government of Queensland asked to use Scotbar’s quarry as a temporary toxic waste dump. Payne, believing it to be his civic duty to help, agreed to the disposal of 100,000 tons of contaminated waste under the assumption that once the emergency was over, the government would assist in remediation. He was wrong. Instead, Scotbar was forced to invest in machinery upgrades, including bullet proof glass on its heavy earth moving machinery, due to the risks posed from the unexploded ordinance in the waste. Different government agencies argued among themselves over conflicting regulations for three years, further delaying remediation. “It was just stupid,” Payne exclaimed.

There was no coordination in the system for something like that.  And there were no guidelines as to how to deal with a situation like this. We were still under a state of emergency and these guys couldn’t get it [right].

For more than three years, Scotbar was essentially shut down as the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA), the mines department, and various other local, state, and federal government departments worked out an agreement. Although the government eventually reimbursed Scotbar $12 million for direct cleanup and remediation expenses, the company received no compensation for lost revenues. “We didn’t claim any and accepted no compensation for three or four years, which was probably stupid on our part,” Payne admitted. “That was our bit for the community as far as compensation.”

Despite the hardship, the process of working out a remediation agreement helped Scotbar establish strong relationships with officials within multiple government departments that would prove helpful as the company sought to introduce new products and establish export markets. It also helped it develop new ways to ensure regulatory compliance. For instance, instead of preparing individual reports, the company established a “live document” of its operations that covered the regulatory reporting requirements for multiple agencies. By 2017, the document had grown to nearly 400 pages. According to one regulator, the relationship produced a “free flow of information.”

If he’s not sure on something he can just give us a yell or send us an email and I have access to standards and everything else. If he needs anything then that’s the rapport, I can assist him to have the best possible outcome.

Sand from Sandstone

When Scotbar finally received permission to resume operations in 2014, one of its first objectives was to return to its original goal, which was to develop cost-effective ways to turn sandstone into sand. Not only was sandstone-derived sand more environmentally sustainable than natural sand, but it would also be essential to the company’s mission of reaching 100 percent resource utilization. As much as 60 percent of the sandstone would normally be discarded as not suitable for slabs, tiles and other traditional sandstone products. Scotbar hoped to turn this “waste” into viable, high quality construction sand.

As a key ingredient in concrete and other construction and landscaping products, sand represented a large and growing market. In 2016, global demand for sand reached nearly 14 billion tons, compared to 8 billion tons in 2004.[3] At the same time, sand was becoming increasingly scarce.

Traditionally, sand was extracted in natural form by dredging river and sea beds. As the world’s population grew, the demand for sand created serious environmental problems, particularly the loss of aquatic habitats. The problem gained wider awareness in 2012 when French documentary director Denis Delestrac released a film titled Sand Wars. “You can’t make cement out of desert sand because the grains won’t stick together,” noted British novelist Simon Ings in his review of the film.

You make cement with [alluvial] sand, and that is a finite resource. We are building so many dams that our rivers barely reach the sea, and so the sand we consume in construction is no longer being replenished. In fact, sand is now in such short supply that it is being smuggled around the world. The island of Singapore spreads, meter by meter, on foundations of smuggled sand. Moroccan hotels are rising in front of beaches annihilated to make them. In the Malay Archipelago, whole islands are being dredged away to build apartments that are then kept empty for investment.[4]

In Australia, where much of the sand was exported for projects such as the Burj Khalifa skyscraper in Dubai, the EPA had begun to impose new regulations to limit the amount of river and sea bed dredging. Some within the industry predicted that within 10 years, the practice would be banned outright. Moreover, areas that could be dredged for sand were inconsistent in quality. Material that contained a large percentage of clays, silts, and organic materials resulted in shrinkage and cracking in concrete and related construction products. Cement producers often used additives that could counteract impurities, but they were not as effective as using pure sand and they added to the cost of the end product. Finally, the availability of sand fluctuated based on uncontrollable environmental events. For instance, a flood could contaminate natural sand with silt and other impurities making it unusable without excessive energy, water and additional processing costs to reduce the contamination.

Given these challenges, Scotbar knew that there would be a market for its sand, if priced competitively. Initial trials using sand from sandstone suggested it was ideal for construction applications. Scotbar’s sandstone quarry contained some of the oldest fresh water-derived deposits in the world, with highly valued color, strength, and mineral characteristics (see Exhibit 2). It was not only plentiful, it was far purer and more consistent than river sand, resulting in highly reliable and consistent concrete and other end products.[5] When broken down to single quartz crystals, it was also high plastic and shrank less than other forms of sandstone.

Large Australian mining companies with substantial market share in diverse quarry products spent more than a decade and millions of research dollars trying to produce high grade sand from sandstone. Nevertheless, none could produce commercially viable high grade sand products. In its initial research, Scotbar identified several hurdles that prevented large multinational companies from producing sand, because they continued to utilize traditional hard rock crushing methods. “Trying to crush the material as you would in a hard rock quarry destroyed the shape and integrity of the crystal and reduced its capabilities,” explained Scotbar sales manager, Greg Lennox.

Payne believed that the barriers were more psychological than technical. “With their corporate structures and the way they cost things, it is very difficult for them to get their head around it,” he explained. Every effort to crush sandstone into sand resulted in angular aggregates that could not be used in concrete.[6]  He knew that if Scotbar could reduce sandstone down to the level of single quartz crystals it would result in irrefutable advantages. The key was to abandon traditional crushing methods and design a completely new process.

“From August 2014, there had been a dramatic change,” recalled Lennox.

We invested a lot of money in research and development. We knew that there was a possibility of being able to turn sandstone back into sand, but in the early stages we didn’t actually know how we would achieve this. When we researched it, there was no real evidence or developed processes to support this proposal, so we trialed many things. We now have $2.6 million worth of experiences, because from every action we took, we learned something. Every action took us to the next step, a step that we hadn’t necessarily envisaged we would follow. We had some trials that never worked, but they weren’t failures. They were, as I said, steps to the next progression. But the dedication that has come from Alan,  Terry and the rest of the crew to get us to where we are now is second to none. There is a passion there that you can’t buy.

By December 2014, Scotbar finalized a plan for processing the sandstone and set about constructing a trial plant (see Exhibit). Once completed, the trial plant was eventually able to produce sand that was 97 percent pure quartz crystal and three percent mineral. Moreover, it contained no clays, silts or organics. Unfortunately, the cost of preparing the raw materials was already higher than what the end product could be sold for. At a time when customers remained price focused, Scotbar’s method was 50 percent more expensive to produce than standard sand mining. Longer term, sand prices were expected to increase as the resource became scarcer and governments enacted stricter environmental regulations, including forcing sand miners to complete costly remediation projects aimed at returning mining sites to their natural state. As such, the company expected its crushing costs to reach parity with traditional sand mining within eight years.[7]

Early market testing raised questions about the willingness of customers to embrace this new “manufactured” natural sand as a substitute for natural sand. “What we didn’t envisage was how difficult it would be to get people to share our vision and think outside the box,” noted Lennox.

Customers were price-driven, right from the start, so their first question was “what’s your price!” and my answer was “What’s your real cost not only to purchase sand and to produce concrete, but also ripping up slabs due to failures, the time and cost involved with dealing with the complaint, and the cost to your brand image?” They didn’t know.

What we have isn’t just a sand replacement. We have something that was going to offer people a lot of benefits. But there was apathy, because we are a little minnow company operating in a multinational world. A lot of apathy because multinationals had tried to do what we have done in 18 months and failed.

Whenever Lennox was rejected, he implored the customer to call him if their existing products failed. The first such call came in October 2015 from a manager at a company he had met several months earlier.

The guy rings up and says, “You’ve got your opportunity, we’re sending up the trucks, have you got materials?” I said, “Yes, no worries.” This multinational company had been having massive issues with cracking, with a whole lot of staining of concrete that had to be ripped up and replaced. We had the material, but we had to meet their current buying price. We made a commercial decision to get the materials there and work out the costs later. Our material instantly resolved a lot of the issues. They ended up mixing our fine sand with someone else’s coarse sand, but our fine sand had so many benefits that it was masking the bad effects of the natural sand.

After making some requested material grading adjustments, they began  purchasing  the material that we made for them and they have continued buying it. Although the benefits of using our material were very evident on our first visit, our client could now see the potential savings in ongoing repair costs and his clients were experiencing significant benefits – far better finish, a dramatic reduction in cracking, shorter time required before the boxing could be removed.

Our customer also increased his market share due to the quality improvement. The quantities of material they purchase from us have gone astronomical, to the point where now we can’t supply their total requirement, because our prototype plant is too small. The prototype plant is restricted to 750 tons production in a 10 hour day. To meet their demand, we need to produce about 3,000 tons per day. So even if we go to double shifts, seven days a week, we still can’t do it.

Although the trial plant was unable to produce the volumes needed to reach cost parity with natural sand, the company believed that with sufficient scale, its production costs could be further reduced. Moreover, customers did not immediately factor in other potential cost savings further down the supply chain.

Yet, even at current prices, its existing customer began using it exclusively in premium cement products and, as a result, Scotbar had plans to increase pilot plant output by at least 40 percent immediately. Despite the construction industry’s sensitivity to cost, the cement companies found more of their contractors demanding this new mix design concrete after hearing that it resulted in fewer failures and lower support costs.

In the long term, Scotbar hoped to convince other potential customers that sandstone derived sand was superior to river sand. However, as a new product, there was insufficient evidence to support the claim. Instead, Scotbar concentrated on the superior quality of the material, such as purity and consistency, and encouraged other clients to try it rather than to make conjectures about longer-term reliability.

The company also began working with local universities to provide resilience testing and product analyses that could be used to support its claims. This was also the first step to winning regulatory approval for major construction projects. Until then, Scotbar’s sand could only be classified as a “filler” and had to be blended with regular sand during production.

The next step was to build a “mega” plant that could produce large volumes of sand using the techniques learned from the prototype (see Exhibit).[8]  Payne sent his top engineers to various countries to study other wet processing methods with the objective of building the best sand plant possible. Ideally, the new plant would be fully automated and self-regulating using various sensors and monitors. This would likely further reduce costs and provide a more sustainable business model.

One of the more promising technologies was owned by CDE Global, a Northern Ireland-based supplier of wet processing equipment. Founded in 1999, CDE grew on a wave of expansion in South Asia and the Middle East to become the largest supplier of sand washing equipment in the world. Although CDE had begun working with Australian sand quarries in 2013 to develop glass products, it would need to work closely with Scotbar to adapt the machinery to Helidon sandstone[9] in a manner that complied with Australian environmental legislation. Despite a projected capital expenditure of $20 million, the mega plant was expected to reduce production costs significantly through a combination of additional process improvements and economies of scale.

Sandstone Tile

Another major product innovation was Scotbar’s unique line of sandstone tiles. Although sandstone tiles had long been available for construction, because of their weight, they were typically not used in walls, except in higher end buildings that were specially engineered to support the tiles. The added construction cost meant that sandstone tile was not commercially viable for wall construction for the middle to lower housing market.

By reducing the weight by as much as 75 percent, Scotbar viewed its engineered sandstone tile as one of the more important innovations in the building industry, reducing end-product costs by as much as 90 percent relative to traditional sandstone building products. “Our tile still retains the sandstone characteristics, esthetics, insulation and sound, and yet is able to be installed on structural frameworks used in standard home construction,” Lennox noted. Moreover, traditional sandstone construction had to be undertaken by specialized stone masons, whereas the tiles could be installed by any qualified building contractor.

Scotbar’s sandstone tiles were constructed from 3mm stone slices that were pasted onto a tile backing for support. They were then laminated to increase strength and prevent cracking and breakage. This process allowed Scotbar to use weaker sandstone that would crumble under normal conditions. “Around 85 percent of the world’s surface is covered in sandstone,” observed Payne. “But most of it crumbles and cannot be used for sandstone buildings because it wouldn’t be strong enough.”[10] This process allowed Scotbar to utilize mined products that would normally be rejected.

Engineered sandstone had other benefits. For instance, faults in the stone would normally lead to cracks and other problems that would prevent their use in construction. Laminated tiles turned these faults into features, adding visible depth and structure to the end product. The added strength also extended the lifespan of the tiles relative to traditional sandstone, which cracked, chipped, or crumbled as they aged and were exposed to the elements.

Once installed, the sandstone tiles looked like traditional sandstone. “We took sandstone from the top three percent of the construction market and made it available to probably 60 percent of the market,” explained Payne. “It’s slightly more expensive than brick veneer but you can get a sandstone finish.”

All of your structural requirements in the house design are adequate; there are no additional costs incurred in having a frame able to carry the substantial weight of a traditional sandstone tile. It’s the same as a rendered house or a brick veneer. That also allowed us – because we laminate that material – to use block which is beautiful in color, but that couldn’t otherwise be used because of breakage.

To produce this product locally would have required a large fixed cost investment in manufacturing. Therefore, Scotbar chose to outsource production to a tile manufacturer in China. It shipped the raw sandstone from its Helidon quarry overseas, where it was processed according to the company’s strict specifications, before being shipped back to Australia in finished form.

Scotbar considered patenting the tile and the manufacturing process, but was unsure if it was worth the cost and effort. Even if patents were granted, Scotbar reasoned that competitors would find a way to circumvent them. “It won’t take too long for a smart engineer to work out what we have done,” observed Lennox. “Changing just one component, one part of the process, or the design, even the size, will have a competitor on the market. And the risk is always there for the Chinese to copy it, even if we did have a patent.” Nevertheless, Lennox believed the risk to be manageable through Scotbar’s established relationship with the Chinese sandstone industry and its close collaboration with major Chinese factories.

Research and Development

Research and development was a large component of Scotbar’s strategy. “It doesn’t matter how much money comes in the door, we still spend it,” Payne asserted. Although large mining companies also dedicated funds to R&D, their size made it difficult to quickly bring new products to market. Payne postulated that most large mining companies spent up to five percent of revenue on research, but when viable products or production techniques were developed, it took between three and five years to commercialize them.

Payne believed that Scotbar, as a small mining company that was less weighed down by bureaucracy, could react faster to product and market developments. That advantage provided little solace, however, as Payne was frustrated by the inability of his competitors to improve their environmental practices.

The frustrating part is the big companies are able to pursue innovations and have the available surplus funds, but it’s just so slow, even when they choose to do something.

Although Scotbar’s employees were continually suggesting new product ideas, the company had limited funds and therefore had to prioritize projects. The profit on one new product was then used to fund the development of other products. As a result, all new product research was self-funded and did not require borrowing or outside investors. One exception was university partnerships. Scotbar occasionally partnered with local universities that had access to government grants and other research funding. In such cases, outside funding was administered through the university R&D labs, which in turn provided testing and advice to Scotbar.

One of Scotbar’s newest opportunities was development of the quartz flour material that could be used in cement manufacturing. From an environmental perspective, its inclusion could reduce the amount of pollution created from cement production. “Cement manufacture is one of the biggest carbon emitters in the world,” explained Payne. “If we can utilize our flour, it would make an actual difference.”

However, quartz flour was a low margin product compared to other sandstone products from the quarry. To earn a profit, Scotbar would need to sell a larger volume. The challenge was to convince enough customers to change their production methods and accept the concept that a new product could be as good, if not better, than the standard.

One hint that sandstone derived materials might provide superior longer-term performance came from a road construction project that had been completed several years earlier. The Australian government decided to construct a new prison and hired several companies to provide materials for the new road. Two Scotbar engineers developed a sandstone derived non-dusting road base. “We knew we had a good product,” asserted Payne, “because when they were building a prison out here, we laid it down and they couldn’t dig it up again, as it compacted so well and remained bound together.”

Instead of some idiots in ties running around trying to do stuff that resulted in nothing, we got some guys in that knew what they were doing. Eanan and Greg started engineering road products and developing standards in the road base. The material the team developed enabled us to do a section of the main road, and it’s the only section between Toowoomba and Dalby that hasn’t failed. So, from that we knew we had something that was worth investing in.

Until we got Eanan and then Greg and now Malcolm on board, we were just guessing that the components that we had were right, and they then refined that and developed new products. Now using the same core material, we have been able to engineer products that, when placed correctly, could double the life expectancy of the project.

Furthermore, traditional gravel road base material normally had to be dug up after years of use before road crews could pave asphalt over it. Scotbar’s non-dusting road base could be easily paved over resulting in “incredible” cost savings.

Although the company was convinced that its sandstone-derived road base was superior to other road building materials, they were unable to win state approval for the product due to multiple road failures in other parts of the country where sandstone had been used for road base. Other companies “cut corners,” Payne explained.

It doesn’t fail when it’s done correctly. You have to use equipment to get it in the right shape for it to perform. We’ve got probably 25 to 30 different types of clay on this site. Not all clays will make it – some of them will go slippery as hell when they’re wet, others shrink when they’re dry. If they shrink too much then the road cracks and falls apart and is extremely dusty and unsafe. What we required was a specific type of clay that we would blend at specific rates. It’s like putting medicine together. You’ve got prescribed amounts of a whole lot of different products. When you blend that and you put the right amount of water in and it’s laid properly, you get those benefits.

In the end, the government issued a blanket ban on the use of sandstone in road construction, a ban that Scotbar had been unable to get overturned, despite several approaches. Payne believed that even if he could convince officials, the government would be forced to grant permits to other sandstone producers. With more than 4,000 quarries in Queensland, it would be nearly impossible to ensure that other producers would not once again cut corners.

A Model for Sustainability?

To date, Scotbar had neither received nor applied for any patents for its machinery modifications or process improvements. Yet, even without a patent, Scotbar believed that the threat posed by its major competitors was minimal. Not only was the company in a better position to exploit its new sand crushing technology, its source material was better suited to the new process.

A critical part to the success of the sustainability program was that products be handled the least number of times necessary to access raw materials. High quality slabs removed from the pit went straight to the sales pad, while the remaining sandstone was loaded onto trucks and sent to the sand plant for processing into sand and other engineered products.

In some areas, the company tried to not only restore mined areas, but improve them. For instance, Australia historically engaged in a practice of clear cut logging. Entire forests were cut down and then replanted with economically viable trees rather than the local species. This left much of the country with monoculture forests. Scotbar planted forests around its mining sites with indigenous tree species that had been previously logged out of the area more than 100 years ago.

Yet, as a mining company, its ability to mitigate environmental damage was limited and as Scotbar grew, so did its environmental impact. The company was already consuming vast amounts of water and hundreds of liters of diesel fuel per hour.[11] Upon completion of the mega plant, fuel and water consumption was projected to increase by an order of magnitude. The contradiction was not lost on Payne who took a realistic view of resource consumption. If the world was going to continue to consume resources at an alarming rate, the focus had to be on minimizing, rather than eliminating, that impact. “I’m certainly not a tree hugger,” he asserted,

I don’t mean that in a disrespectful way. Most of the people who I call tree huggers are people with a genuine concern, but no knowledge of what they’re fighting for. So, their principle is right, but they just don’t get it.

Payne acknowledged that reaching his goal of 100 percent resource utilization would require producing some products that would be less profitable. However, he believed that Scotbar’s strategy was about more than profit. “We don’t go and lie on the beach in the Bahamas. We’re married to our little dream and commitment of making a difference in doing what we’re doing.”

It’s not for money. Forget the fact that it’s hard; everything we do is ultimately for people. We should be doing things for our society, for people, for our environment. Yes, making money is a part of it, but that doesn’t sit above people, because people are what make up the world. If you take any CEO from any company in the world and go, here is a $100 billion bonus, but there’s no-one else on the earth, it isn’t good for you. So, I just don’t get that, where they lose sight of humanity. It is all about a balance.




Exhibit 1

Waste Stockpile from previous mining operations at the Waterfall Mine

Source: Scotbar Proprietary Limited


Exhibit 2

Comparison of Different Sand Forms

Conventional Alluvial Sand                          New process Sandstone sand

Source: Scotbar Proprietary Limited




Exhibit 3

Sand Plant Prototypes and Concept

Sandstone sand Wash Pilot PlantPrototype plant designed by Scotbar
Prototype plant designed by ScotbarCDE Global: Concept for Mega Plant dewatering plant



Source: Scotbar Proprietary Limited

[1] All financial data is in Australian dollars unless otherwise noted.

[2] Quarry Owner Recognised as Local Hero, Quarry Magazine, February 1, 2012.

( Accessed June 11, 2017)

[3] An improbable global shortage: sand. The Economist, March 30, 2017.

( Accessed May 30, 2017)

[4] Ings, Simon, The story of climate change gets star treatment, The New Scientist, April 23, 2014 ( Accessed May 17, 2017)

[5] Finer particles of material smaller than 75 microns, and that are washed out of the sand to achieve compliance with the required grading for concrete manufacture, are high in plastic properties with very low shrinkage. Scotbar believed this fine material, when further processed, had the potential with continued research and development to be used in applications as wide ranging as beauty products to liner material for construction of waste containment.

[6] “Sharply angular materials (like manufactured sand or stone dust) are more prone to compaction than sub-angular particles. Sub-angular particles … will be relatively stable because they can nest together without rolling, and will resist compaction as the rounded edges have voids between them. Particles need some angularity to offer resistance to movement. Round particles (such as river or beach sand) create more voids and resist compaction, but … have more stability when moisture is added.” Source: Footing Solutions and Sand Specifications, Premier Equestrian ( Accessed May

22, 2017)

[7] In the United States, bulk sand used in oil production increased in price from USD $20 per ton in 2016 to $40 per ton in 2017. Source: Matthews, Christopher M. and Erin Ailworth, Latest Threat to U.S. Oil Drillers: The Rocketing Price of Sand, The Wall Street Journal, March 23, 2017. ( Accessed June 8, 2017)

[8] The Scotbar quarry was estimated to have 100 million tons sand reserve.

[9] Helidon is a municipal district in Queensland, Australia renowned for its natural mineral water springs and high-quality sandstone.

[10] The Sandman, Master Builder Queensland, June/July 2015, Vol. 54:6, p. 54

[11] Scotbar maintained its own water recycling pools that nearly eliminated all water waste and runoff. According to the company, the only water lost was through evaporation.



Our Clients

Want to know more? Get in touch.

Want to stay up to date? Just enter your email below to subscribe to our newsletter.

*We will never share your details.